By: Jim
Verdonik
You can check out my newspaper articles at http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/search/results/_author/Jim+Verdonik?market=triangle&_author=Jim+Verdonik&title=
Jim Verdonik
Founder of Innovate Capital Law
Contact me at:
(919)616-3225
You can check out my newspaper articles at http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/search/results/_author/Jim+Verdonik?market=triangle&_author=Jim+Verdonik&title=
You can purchase my books at http://www.amazon.com/Jim-Verdonik/e/B0040GUBRW
Title IV of the JOBS Act directed the Securities and
Exchange Commission to issue a new regulation A with higher offering limits and
other provisions that make the new Regulation A more attractive to
issuers. The new Regulation A has been
nicknamed Regulation A+, because it permits you to raise more money with fewer
restrictions than in old Regulation A..
On March 25, 2015, the SEC issued final rules for
Regulation A+ in Release No. 33-9741.
In this article, we'll discuss how you can use
Regulation A+ to become a microcap public company and the advantages and disadvantages of using Regulation A+
compared to merging with a public shell company or doing a self-registration
without an underwriter.
Legal
Eligibility to Use Regulation A+
Let's briefly list the types of issuers who
are legally allowed to conduct Regulation A+ offerings:
- U. S.
and Canadian companies;
- That
conduct an active business or that will use the proceeds of the offering
to purchase an active business that is identified in the offering
disclosure documents;
- That are
not yet public reporting companies or registered investment companies; and
- That have not committed a list of securities violations specified in Regulation A+'s Bad Actor rules.
Now, let's talk about
how Regulation A+ compares to two other types of transactions that sometimes
attract similar types of businesses.
Regulation A+'s Sweet Spot
Regulation A+
offerings can help you achieve many of the same business objectives that in the
past were the goals of companies that did mergers into public shell companies
or did self-registrations without an underwriter.
This article compares
the advantages and disadvantages of three types of transactions both to raise
capital and to become publicly traded companies:
- Regulation A+ Offerings.
- Merging into a public shell company.
- Self-registration without an underwriter.
Either merging into a public shell or a
self-registration can be combined with a Rule 506 offering or other exempt
offering as a way to raise money and become public without doing a traditional
IPO through a firm commitment underwritten registered public offering. Often, shares are registered for re-sale by
investors from a prior private placement offering. Companies often make contractual commitments
to investors in the earlier private offering to become public by registering their
shares for re-sale or by merging into a public shell followed by a re-sale
registration within a specified time period after the earlier private offering.
Desired
Results
But most people care less about process than the results they achieve. Let's examine three different pathways to achieving the following results:
·
Raise up to $50 million
·
Give investors in the offering the ability to
re-sell shares to the public.
·
Create a trading market for all shareholders.
Table 1 below identifies the specific steps each
pathway (Regulation A+, public shell mergers and self-registrations) requires
to help businesses raise capital, give investors the legal ability to re-sell
shares and create a public market.
Although Table 1 below compares Tier 2 Regulation A+
Offerings to public shell mergers and self-registrations, we shouldn't assume
that Tier 2 offerings are always a better choice than Tier I offerings. Tier 1 Regulation A+ offerings can help you
achieve many of the same things a Tier 2 offering does. Or a Tier 1 offering may be a useful step
toward later doing a Tier 2 offering.
In another article, we discuss how Tier 1 ofRegulation
A+ differs from Tier 2, the goals they can each help you achieve and how to
choose between doing a Tier 1 offering or a Tier 2 offering.
Now, let's jump into comparing Tier 2 Regulation A+
offerings to public shell mergers combined with a Rule 506 offering and to a
self-registration following a Rule 506 offering.
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF TRANSACTION STEPS
|
||
Regulation A+
(Tier 2 Offering)
|
Public Shell Merger
Combined with Private Offering Before or After the Merger
|
Self-Registration
Combined with Private Offering Before the Registration
|
The typical Tier 2 Regulation A+ offering is likely to include the
following steps:
·
File Form 1-A with the SEC to begin the offering
period.
·
File a draft Form 1-A privately like in a
registered public offering. SEC
Reviews Form 1-A and provides comments to the issuer, but the filing and SEC
comments must be made public at least 21 days before the SEC qualifies the
offering to sell securities.
·
Make changes to disclosures in Form 1-A as the SEC
requests.
·
SEC "qualifies" the offering.
·
Can add pricing information to offering circular
after offering is qualified.
·
OPTIONAL STEP: If you want to become a full 1934
Exchange Act company, file Form 8-A or Form 10 with the SEC
·
Begin sales in the Regulation A+ offering.
·
Complete the offering. Offering can continue for up to three
years. Amend offering materials by
filing annual financial statements and to report "fundamental
changes" in the disclosed
information.
·
File Form 1-Z with the SEC to report sales in the
offering and file sales notices with states where securities were sold in the
offering.
·
Brokers can begin quoting prices in the market for
the stock by complying with Rule 15c2-11.
·
Investors who purchase shares in the Regulation A+
offering can immediately begin re-selling shares acquired in the offering. Shareholders
who did not purchase shares in the Regulation A+ offering can re-sell shares
not issued in the Regulation A+ offering by complying with Rule 144. Such shareholders may have already
satisfied Rule 144's one-year holding period.
|
A Public Shell Merger combined with the a private offering may include
the following steps:
|
A self-registration combined with the a private offering may include
the following steps:
·
OPTIONAL STEP: : If you want to become a full 1934
Exchange Act company, file Form 8-A or Form 10 with the SEC
|
Table 1 above describes the primary steps required
to complete each of the three multi-step transactions that include both capital
raising and a pathway to becoming a publicly traded company.
Important
Timing Differences
All three types of transactions require
approximately six months from the start until investors in the offering can
begin re-selling their shares, but there are important timing differences for
when the issuer receives money, investors can re-sell shares and public market
trading in shares begins:
- In the
Regulation A+ offering, the issuer receives capital at the time it becomes
a publicly traded company, which is similar to what happens in a
traditional underwritten registered IPO.
- Some public
shell transactions and self-registrations can occur at the same time as a
financing, but in most cases the financing either precedes or occurs after
the company becomes publicly traded.
Table 1 above shows the steps of shell merger transactions and
self-registrations where the capital raising occurs before the company
becomes publicly traded.
- Where
there is a time gap between raising capital and becoming publicly traded,
someone is taking a risk that the other part of the transaction will not
happen.
- If the
financing precedes the public shell merger or self-registration, the
investors bear the risk that the company will not become publicly traded
or that public trading will be delayed.
Investor risk usually results in lower valuations when you sell
securities.
- If the
public shell merger or self-registration precedes the financing, the
issuer and its existing shareholders bear the risk that the capital
raising transaction will not occur or will be delayed after the company
becomes public. Obtaining adequate
financing after you become public is not guaranteed. Being a small publicly traded company
that is undercapitalized substantially increases risk for the issuer and
its shareholders.
- Investors and the issuer and is shareholders may decide to share the risk by doing one capital raise before the issuer is publicly traded and a bigger capital raise after the company becomes publicly traded.
Now, let's compare the advantages and disadvantages
of each type of transaction based on the regulations that apply to each. We have divided these advantages and
disadvantages into three groups:
- Table 2
summarizes Transaction Process and Restrictions
- Table 3
summarizes Shareholder Liquidity Issues: Resale Restrictions and Creating
Public Trading Markets
- Table 4 summarizes Post-Closing Reporting Requirement
Transaction
Process and Restrictions
As you review Table 2 below, keep the following in
mind:
- Regulation
A+ applies a single set of regulations to govern both the capital raising
portion of the transaction and becoming a publicly traded company. By doing so, Regulation A+ mimics the
traditional registered IPO, but with special rules that are more suitable
to smaller businesses than the issuers who usually do registered underwritten
IPOs. For both public shell mergers
and self registrations, different securities regulations govern the
capital raising transaction and the process of becoming publicly traded.
- All
three transactions normally take four to six months to raise capital and
provide investor liquidity, but unexpected issues longer than six months.
- All
three transactions have comparable costs, except that in the public shell
merger transaction, the issuer also has to purchase the public shell
company for cash, for stock or for a combination of cash and stock.
- Each of
the transactions can often be completed for $50,000 to $100,000 in legal
fees, but the individual circumstances of the issuer can increase
transaction legal fees above that range.
There are also accounting fees and selling commissions and
expenses.
- Regulation A+ costs are always front loaded. Most of the expenses are incurred before you raise capital. That means the issuer bears the risk that the costs will be incurred, but the issuer will either not raise money or will raise less than it anticipated. Some issuers may do a small capital raise to finance the transaction costs before they start a bigger Regulation A+ offering. We discuss this strategy in greater detail in another article.
TABLE 2 - TRANSACTION PROCESS AND RESTRICTIONS
|
|||
Regulation A+
(Tier 2)
Offering
|
Public Shell Merger
Combined with Private Offering Before or After the Merger
|
Self-Registration
Combined with Private Offering Before the Registration
|
|
Purchase Price of the Public Shell Company
|
None
|
Price Varies with Market Conditions
Price can be for cash, stock or a combination
|
None
|
Transaction Expenses other than Purchase Price of the Public Shell
|
Usually between $50,000 to $100,000 in legal fees, plus accounting fees
and sales commissions and expenses, that will vary according to the size and
difficulty of the transaction.
|
Usually between $50,000 to $100,000 in legal fees, plus accounting fees
and sales commissions and expenses, that will vary according to the size and
difficulty of the transaction.
|
Usually between $50,000 to $100,000 in legal fees, plus accounting fees
and sales commissions and expenses, that will vary according to the size and
difficulty of the transaction.
|
Timing of Transaction Expenses
|
Most legal and accounting transaction expenses will probably occur
before raising capital in the Regulation A+ Offering. Some issuers will need to raise capital to
fund up-front transaction expenses.
|
If the private placement occurs before the company becomes publicly
traded, most expenses probably occur after raising capital in the private
offering.
|
If the private placement occurs before the company becomes publicly
traded, most expenses probably occur after raising capital in the private
offering.
|
Time Investors Can Begin Re-Selling.
If the Regulation A+ issuer can quickly create a trading market, this
instant liquidity should result in higher valuation of the shares.
|
Investors who purchase in the Regulation A+ offering can legally
re-sell immediately the shares purchasedin the offering, unless they are
affiliates of the issuer.
|
Investors in the private placement must wait for registration of their
shares for re-sale or until they can re-sell under Rule 144.
|
Investors in the private placement must wait for registration of their
shares for re-sale or until they can re-sell under Rule 144.
|
Stigma With Investors
|
Regulation A+ offerings are not as highly regarded by institutional
investors as traditional underwritten IPO, but because he SEC reviews the
offing documents there isno real
stigma – especially with recent changes to securities laws that create many
new types of capital raising transactions sad technology changes that are
creating new trading markets.
|
The SEC does not like public shell companies. Some SEC rules place restrictions on public
shells and former public shells that do not apply to other companies. Some investors fear stock manipulation in
public shells and former public shells.
|
Issuers that do self-registrations generally are not as highly regarded
by investors as companies that did traditional IPOs, because they lack the
backing of an underwriting syndicate, analyst following and have low trading
volume but SEC rules do not penalize issuers.
|
Risks from Free Trading Shares
|
All free trading shares are issued to investors in the Regulation A+ offering
at a verifiable investment price. The
price is usually higher than the price existing shareholders paid in earlier
financings, which reduces market manipulation risks for issuers and their
existing shareholders.
|
Insiders of the public shell may have a very low purchase price per
share and identities may be hidden behind dummy accounts. Both increase the risk of market
manipulation.
|
All shares being registered are issued to investors in the private
placement offering at a verifiable investment price and are named in the
re-sale registration statement, which reduces market manipulation risks for
issuers and their existing shareholders.
|
State Registration Preemption
|
Yes. State registration laws are
pre-empted for both primary sales by the issuer and re-sales by the issuer's
affiliates in the Regulation A+ offering without regard to whether the issuer
lists the shares on a national securities exchange.
|
Rule 506 pre-empts state registration laws for the capital raising. But state registration laws are not
pre-empted for re-sales by affiliates, unless the issuer lists the shares on
a national securities exchange.
|
Rule 506 pre-empts state registration laws for the capital
raising. But state registration laws
are not pre-empted for re-sales by affiliates, unless the issuer lists the
shares on a national securities exchange.
|
As indicated in Table 2 above, affiliates of the
issuer are permitted to re-sell shares in the Regulation A+ offering. But new investors often see re-sales by
insiders as a warning sign. Therefore,
many issuers may choose to limit re-sales by insiders in Regulation A+
offerings.
Liquidity
For Shareholders: Resale Restrictions and Creating Public Trading Markets
Even if insiders re-sell some shares in Regulation
A+ offerings, the primary source of liquidity will depend upon the legal
ability to re-sell shares into the market after the Regulation A+ offering and
the issuer's ability to create a public trading market for its shares.
Table 3 below discusses the rules that affect public
market trading following each of the three types of transactions. We can see from the table below that:
·
Regulation A+ offers certain advantages in
facilitating trading.
·
The Regulation A+ advantage starts with the issuance
of free trading shares in the Regulation A+ offering that are not
"restricted securities."
·
The ability to re-sell Regulation A+ offering shares
without a registration statement means that it isn't necessary to file and update
a re-sale registration statement and avoids disruptions in re-sales if material
events occur that he issuer has not disclosed.
·
By avoiding being a public shell company, the issuer
avoids some SEC restrictions on public shell companies, including limitations
on the use of Rule 144, legend removal issues and limitations on the issuer
using Form S-3 in later registrations.
·
Brokers can quote prices in public markets for
Regulation A+ issuers under Rule 15c2-11 like they can for full 1934 Exchange
Act reporting companies
·
Regulation A+ issuers can use Form 8-A to list
securities on a national securities exchange at the time of qualification or
re-qualification of a Regulation A+ offering.
TABLE 3 - LIQUIDITY FOR SHAREHOLDERS: RE-SALE RESTRICTIONS AND
CREATING PUBLIC TRADING MARKETS
|
|||
Regulation A+
(Tier 2)
Offering
|
Public Shell Merger
Combined with Private Offering Before or After the Merger
|
Self-Registration
Combined with Private Offering Before the Registration
|
|
Are shares sold in the offering "restricted securities?"
|
No. Shares sold in the Regulation A+ offering are not restricted
securities. Non Affiliates can re-sell
unrestricted securities issued in the Regulation A+ offering without
complying with Rule 144 and without further registration.
|
Yes. All securities sold in the
private placement offering are "restricted securities." Must either register the re-sale of the
shares or comply with Rule 144 to re-sell restricted securities.
|
Yes. All securities sold in the
private placement offering are "restricted securities." Must either register the re-sale of the
shares or comply with Rule 144 to re-sell restricted securities.
|
Maintaining an updated re-sale registration.
|
Because shares purchased in the Regulation A+ offering are not
restricted shares, investors who are not affiliates of the issuer can re-sell
shares purchased in the Regulation A+ offering without updating a re-sale
registration statement.
|
Re-sale registration statements must be up-dated to enable shareholders
listed in the registration statement to re-sell. This can cause expenses and the occurrence
of material events may cause re-sales to be suspended until disclosure is
made.
|
Re-sale registrations must be up-dated to enable shareholders listed in
the registration statement to re-sell.
This can cause expenses and the occurrence of material events may
cause re-sales to be suspended until disclosure is made.
|
Is Rule 144 available for re-sale of "restricted securities?"
|
Yes. Regulation A+'s semi-annual
filing requirements qualify as current public information for purposes of
Rule 144 (c) for half the year. Issuers
can voluntarily file two additional quarterly reports to maintain Rule 144
availability for the full year. Since
these extra filings are voluntary, the issuer can exercise control over the
timing of market re-sales.
|
Yes, Rule 144 is available for re-sales if the issuer is current in its
1934 Exchange Act periodic reports, but use of Rule 144 is restricted for one
year the issuer files Form 10 information with the SEC that reflects the
issuer is no longer a shell company.
|
Yes, Rule 144 is available for re-sales, if the issuer is current in
its 1934 Exchange Act periodic reports.
|
Termination of current public information requirement for non-affiliate
re-sales under Rule 144.
|
The current public information requirement of Rule 144 (c) ceases to be
required for re-sales by non-affiliates upon the later of (i) one year after
purchase from the issuer or (ii) three months after ceasing to be an
affiliate of he issuer.
|
Rule 144 (i) continues in perpetuity the current public information
requirement of Rule 144 (c) for all shareholders of former public shell
companies.
|
The current public information requirement of Rule 144 (c) ceases to be
required for re-sales by non-affiliates upon the later of (i) one year after
purchase from the issuer or (ii) three months after ceasing to be an
affiliate of the issuer.
|
Are legends placed on stock certificates?
If so, when can legends be removed?
|
No legend is required for shares sold in the Regulation A+ offering to
non-affiliates, because they are not "restricted securities."
Legends are required for "restricted securities" that were
not acquired in the Regulation A+ offering until the shares can be re-sold
under Rule 144 without volume restrictions.
Legends on shares not sold in the offering normally can be removed one
year after they acquired a non-affiliate acquires the shares.
|
Legends are required for all "restricted securities" until
the shares can be re-sold under Rule 144 without volume restrictions. The requirement that shareholders of a
former public shell must comply with Rule 144's current public information forever
raises concerns about whether issuers should remove legends and permit holding
shares in street name after the issuer ceases being a shell company.
|
Legends are required for all restricted securities until the shares can
be re-sold under Rule 144 without volume restrictions.
Legends normally can be removed from shares owned by non-affiliates one
year after they acquired the shares.
|
Can shares be held in street name?
|
Shares sold to non-affiliates in the Regulation A+ offering can
immediately be held in street name.
Other shares of a Regulation A+ issuer can be held in street name after
legend removal.
|
Until legends are removed, shares usually cannot be held in street
name.
|
Until legends are removed, shares usually cannot be held in street
name.
|
Rule 15c2-11requiremnts for brokers to quote prices
|
The Regulation A+ offering documents and periodic reports required by
Regulation A+ gives brokers the public information Rule 15c2-11 requires for
brokers to quote prices in public markets.
|
Filing Form 10 information with the SEC and 1934 Act periodic reports gives
brokers the public information Rule 15c2-11 requires for brokers to quote
prices in public markets.
|
Filing Form 10 information with the SEC and 1934 Act periodic reports
gives brokers the public information Rule 15c2-11 requires for brokers to
quote prices.
|
Listing securities for trading on a national securities exchange or
registering under Section 12 (g).
|
Regulation A+ issuers are permitted to list securities for trading on a
national securities exchange by filing Form 8-A when the Regulation A+ offering
is qualified or re-qualified, which is easier than filing a Form 10 with the
SEC, because you can incorporate by reference and effectiveness is automatic.
|
Form 10 information is required and effectiveness is not automatic for
registration purposes.
|
Can use form 8-A as part of the registration process.
|
New Trading Markets
(modeled on the London AIM Exchange and the Canadian TSX Venture
Exchange)
|
The SEC is considering whether to authorize new "venture markets"
like in Canada and London." The SEC
has indicated it is considering making Regulation A+ issuers eligible for
trading on new venture markets.
|
Given past restrictions on public shell companies in SEC rules, the SEC
may restrict use of new venture markets by public shells and former public
shells..
|
There is no known market access penalty or advantage for doing a
self-registration.
|
Ability to Use Form S-3 in later registered offerings
|
By allowing affiliates to re-sell shares in the Regulation A+ offering,
issuers can increase the non-affiliate float to exceed $75million as required
for some uses of Form S-3.
|
Issuers cannot use Form S-3 to do an offering for one year after they
stop being a shell company.
|
There is no penalty or advantage for doing a self-registration.
|
As indicated in Table 3 above, compliance with
periodic reporting requirements are important to allowing holders of restricted
securities to re-sell their shares under Rule 144. The same restrictions don't apply to
Regulation A+ offering shares purchased by non-affiliates, because they are not
"restricted securities."
Primary Differences
in Public Reporting Requirements
As indicated in Table 4 below Regulation A+ issuers
have substantially less onerous reporting requirements than issuers than that
merge with a public shell company that is required to file 1934 Exchange Act
reports or issuers that do a self-registration.
The differences include the following:
·
Regulation A+ requires filing half the reports that
full 1934 Exchange Act compliance requires.
Regulation A+ requires two reports each year compared four reports for a
1934 Exchange Act issuer.
·
Generally, Regulation A+ reports require less detail
than full 1934 Exchange Act reports require.
·
Regulation A+ requires reporting some material
events like on a Form 8-K, but fewer events trigger filings by Regulation A+
issuers.
·
Regulation A+ issuers are not required to file proxy
statements and Section16 and 13 reporting and liability rules do not apply to
purchases and sales by large shareholders, officers and directors of Regulation
A+ issuers.
·
Rule 13a-5 requiring disclosure controls and
procedures and internal controls over financial reporting do not apply to
Regulation A+ issuers that are not listed on a national securities exchange.
·
Regulation A+ provides an easy way to transition to
full 1934 Exchange Act reporting.
TABLE 4 - POST-CLOSING REPORTING OBLIGATIONS
|
|||
Regulation A+
(Tier 2)
Offering
|
Public Shell Merger Combined
with Private Offering Before or After the Merger
|
Self-Registration
Combined with Private Offering Before or After the Registration
|
|
Reporting obligations
|
Form 1-Z discloses sales in the offering
Form 1-K Annual Report includes audited financial statements
Form 1-SA Semi-Annual Report
Form 1-U Current Report for important events
|
Form 10-K Annual Report includes audited financial statements
Three Quarterly Reports
Form 8-K Current Reports
May also include Proxy Statements, Schedule 13Ds and Section 16 reports
and liability depending which Sections of the 1934 Exchange Act applies to the issuer.
|
Form 10-K Annual Report includes audited financial statements
Three Quarterly Reports
Form 8-K Current Reports
May also include Proxy Statements, Schedule 13Ds and Section 16 reports
and liability depending which Sections of the 1934 Exchange Act applies to
the issuer.
|
Rule 13a-5 Disclose Controls and Procedures and Internal Controls Over
Financial Reporting
|
Rule 13a-5's Disclose Controls and Procedures and Internal Controls
over Financial Reporting do not apply to Regulation A+ issuers that are not
listed on a national securities exchange, because they have not filed a
registration statement and the exemption from Section12 (g) registration described
below.
|
Rule 13a-5's Disclose Controls and Procedures apply when the issuer
registers under Section 12 (b) or (g) of the 1934 Exchange Act and Internal
Controls over Financial Reporting rules apply when Section 15 (d) is triggered.
|
Rule 13a-5's Disclose Controls and Procedures apply when the issuer
registers under Section 12 b) or (g) of the 1934 Exchange Act and Internal
Controls over Financial Reporting rules apply when Section 15 (d) is
triggered.
|
When do 1934 Exchange Act Registration and Reporting and Registration
Rules begin to apply
|
Normal rules under Sections 12(b), 12(g) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act
apply as described below, except that Regulation A + issuers have a special
12 (g) registration exemption described below, which means the issuer does
not have normal 1934 Exchange Act reporting obligations, unless the issuer
lists on a national securities exchange or a 1933 Act registration statement
becomes effective.
|
Normal rules under Sections 12(b), 12(g) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act
apply as described below.
|
Normal rules under Sections 12(b), 12(g) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act
apply as described below.
|
Trigger for Registering Under Section 12 (g)
|
Tier 2 Regulation A+ issuers are not required to register under Section
12 (g) for as long as the issuer: (i) retains a registered transfer agent,
(ii) continues to file periodic reports required by Regulation A+ and (iii)
has a public float of less than $75 million (or $50 million in revenue, if
there is no public float). The Regulation
A+ issuer can choose to continue this status even if the issuer exceeds the
total assets and shareholders of record triggers for Section 12 (g) registration. After the issuer no longer complies with
the exemption there is a two year transition period.
|
Section 12 (g) registration is required if the issuer's total assets
exceed $10 million on last day of fiscal year and the issuer has either (i)
2,000 shareholders of record or (ii) 500 non-accredited shareholders of
record.
|
Section 12 (g) registration is required if the issuer's total assets
exceed $10 million on last day of fiscal year and the issuer has either (i)
2,000 shareholders of record or (ii) 500 non-accredited shareholders of
record.
|
Trigger for registering Under Section 12 (b)
|
Section 12 (b) registration is required if the issuer lists securities
for trading in a national securities exchange.
|
Section 12 (b) registration is required if the issuer list securities
for trading in a national securities exchange.
|
Section 12 (b) registration is required if the issuer list securities
for trading in a national securities exchange.
|
Trigger for Section 15 (d)
|
Section 15 (d) of the 1934 Exchange Act is triggered if a registration
statement becomes effective.
|
Section 15 (d) of 1934 Exchange Act is triggered if a registration
statement becomes effective.
|
Section 15 (d) of the 1934 Exchange Act is triggered, if a registration
statement becomes effective.
|
Method for Registering
|
File Form 10 and effective after review and approval by the SEC, except
that Regulation A+ issuers can file a Form, 8-A when the SEC qualifies or
requalifies a Regulation A offering whether or not the issuer is listing securities
on a national securities exchange.
|
File Form 10 and effective after review and approval by the SEC.
|
File Form 10 and effective after review and approval by the SEC, except
that can use form 8-A to list securities on a national securities exchange.
|
Exchange Act Periodic Reporting (10-Ks, 10-Qs, Form 8-Ks)
|
Required if any one of Section 15(d), 12(b) or 12 (g) is triggered by
the issuer.
|
Required if any one of Section 15(d), 12(b) or 12 (g) is triggered by
the issuer.
|
Required if any one of Section 15(d), 12(b) or 12 (g) is triggered by
the issuer.
|
Proxy Statements Requirements
|
Only required if register under Section 12 (b) or 12 (g).
|
Only required if register under Section 12 (b) or 12 (g).
|
Only required if register under Section 12 (b) or 12 (g).
|
Schedule 13D
|
Only required if register under Section 12 (b) or 12 (g).
|
Only required if register under Section 12 (b) or 12 (g).
|
Only required if register under Section 12 (b) or 12 (g).
|
Section 16 liability and filing requirements
|
Only required if register under Section 12 (b) or 12 (g).
|
Only required if register under Section 12 (b) or 12 (g).
|
Only required if register under Section 12 (b) or 12 (g).
|
SEC
Preferences Disfavor Public Shell Companies
When we look at how the SEC has treated Crowdfunding
under Title III of the JOBS Act compared to Regulation A+, we find that the SEC
has made a good faith effort to create workable rules for Regulation A+. For Title III Crowdfunding, the SEC has been
much more obstructionist by proposing rules that will make Title II
Crowdfunding useless to most companies trying to raise capital.
For many years the SEC has made its objections to
Pubic Shell Mergers the world's most poorly kept secret. One wonders: Does the SEC view Regulation A+
as a carrot to induce issuers to choose a Regulation A+ offering instead of
doing a public shell merger?
If the SEC does view Regulation A+ as way to reduce
the number of public shell mergers, issuers can expect the SEC will try to
develop an efficient review and approval process for Regulation A+ offerings.
The SEC has also indicated that it is considering
permitting the creation of "venture exchanges" to facilitate
secondary market trading for small Regulation A+ issuers. Such venture exchanges are likely to be
modeled on the London AIM Exchange and the Canadian TSX Venture Exchange. Don't be surprised if the SEC places
restrictions on shell companies and former shell companies from access to the
venture exchanges. Future access to such
venture exchanges could become a big advantage for Regulation A+ issuers.
Other articles about important Regulation A+ issues
include the following:
Summary of
Key Provisions of New Regulation A+
|
|
Is Title III
Crowdfunding Already Obsolete? Regulation A+ = Supercharged Crowdfunding
|
|
Your Goals
Will Determine Whether Regulation A+ Is Right for Your Business
|
|
Which Should
You Choose: Tier 1 or Tier 2 of Regulation A+?
|
|
Why Choose? Why Not Do Both A Rule 506 Offering Followed
by a Regulation A+ Offering?
|
|
Microcap Financings: Regulation A+
Offerings Join Public Shell Company Mergers and Self-Registrations to Create
Small Public Companies
|
|
State Securities Law Issues in
Regulation A+ Offerings
|
|
Good post! I know that large part of capital is invested in virtual data rooms because of their value on the market. In prospects it could be very profitable branch. The point is that many companies raise their income by using VRDs like Ideals for managing data and performing such time-consuming operations like M&A and due diligence faster and more efficiently.
ReplyDelete